In and of itself, your article is an insulting look into your archaic value system and reflects the misguided belief that all controversy is inherently valuable. The idea that your platform in this newspaper is acceptable because it serves to speak for a community of like-minded men is about as valid as the idea that any hate propaganda deserves a voice if it has an audience. Besides inciting complete disrespect for women, your words represent massive social dysfunction and illuminate the sensibility of the lowest common denominator. They are indicative of someone who has no ability to relate to women on a human level, and portrays the thought-process of a potential sexual predator, abuser or more. And no. That doesn’t change because you were trying to be funny.

For future reference, the following is a list of words that are unacceptable to publish in reference to women being fucked, unless as satire –

THE LIST:

swan
victory
victim
slut
broad
hood-rat
not-as-hot-as-you-thought-she-was
that-pounding-you-gave-her
bang-that-little-cutie
her-walk-of-shame

Q2: How do you demonstrate that people are better than ever at missing the point, but are as quick as ever to adopt some sanctimony and start castigating?

Q3: How do you get the tolerance crowd to express, in explicit detail, their intolerance and vindictiveness?

Mr. Surette, I would submit, has resolved these quandaries.

Thank you, Mr. Surette.

Leave your bias at the door and start thinking for yourself.

Worst 4 years of my life. Witness to the utter degeneration of society.

This country is beyond gone.