To the Editor:
Since graduating, I have attempted to become a well-informed alumnus. The motivation behind my interest in the school stems partially from the fact that as a graduate, the University’s standing in the academic world directly affects me. The other motivator is my guilt over having been such an apathetic student.
Having been so impassive at Fairfield, I find it inspiring to read that the students are actively voicing their disdain over the University’s recent decision to eliminate both the football and hockey programs. It takes strength of character to come together as a group and demand to be heard.
It is understandable that students find the loss of both the football and hockey programs unacceptable. Sports teams embody school pride and provide proof of the student body’s athletic prowess. Their cancellation will narrow the scope of Fairfield athletics and force some talented students to seek playing opportunities elsewhere. It is not a better perspective, just a different one with time and distance from the school. Over the past nine years, I have witnessed Fairfield progress in its journey towards academic greatness.
Overall the school’s evolution has generally been well balanced with strides made in both academics and athletics. The new DiMenna-Nyselius Library and Dolan School of Business buildings are testaments to the school’s ability to maintain cerebral competitiveness while the Walsh Athletic Center and Arena at Harbor Yard agreement are proof of Fairfield’s dedication to sports.
So why eliminate two sports teams? The most obvious reason is the destitute economy. I can only assume the University’s motive was to retain the pivotal strength of financial stabiliy and vitality. Though dedicated to educating the whole person, the school’s ultimate cause is the intellect. Therefore its not surprising that the school has realized these cuts through decreased athletic funding. A possible silver lining to this unfortunate turn of events is that the University can now focus more attention on the remaining varsity programs and campus improvements while maintaining academic growth and financial solvency.
Sincerely, Edward Lahey, ’94
Leave a Reply